پژوهش های روابط بین الملل
راهبرد امنیت ملی چین: تداوم و تغییر امنیتی سازی و امنیتی زدایی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار دانشگاه تهران
2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد روابط بین الملل دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
موضوع تحول در راهبرد امنیت ملی چین و اینکه رشد آن چگونه در آیین امنیتی این کشور در بازتعریف تهدیدها امنیت ملی تبلور یافته است، در دهههای اخیر بحث‌های بسیاری را میان سیاست‌گذاران و جامعۀ محققان برانگیخته است. بررسی و ارزیابی تحول راهبرد امنیت ملی چین در چهارچوب آیین امنیتی «امنیت فراگیر» طی چهار نسل رهبری آن کشور، هدف این مقاله است. پرسشی که جست‌وجوی پاسخ آن در کانون توجه این مقاله قرار دارد، این است که چگونه راهبرد امنیت ملی چین در چهار نسل رهبری چین تعریف و بازتعریف شده است؟ در پاسخ به این پرسش، از روش تبیینی‌تحلیلی و چهارچوب نظری «امنیت فراگیر» باری بوزان و ویور در مکتب کپنهاگ استفاده می‌شود تا قدرت تبیین و پیش‌بینی اصول و گزارههای مکتب مزبور با واقعیت بیرونی تحول راهبرد امنیت ملی چین سنجیده شود. فرضیه اصلی این است که امنیتیسازی و امنیتیزدایی موردنظر ویور و مؤلفههای امنیت فراگیر، در بسیاری مواقع توان ارزیابی تحولات امنیتی چین را ندارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
China's National Security Strategy: Continuance and Change in Securitizing and De-securitizing
نویسندگان [English]
- Mohammad Reza Saeedabadi 1
- Fatemeh Mahrough 2
1 Assistant Professor University of Tehran
2 M.Sc. Student in International Relations, University of Tehran
چکیده [English]
The issue of transformation in China's national security strategy has fueled many debates among policymakers and research communities in the past decades. Additionally, the fact that China's growth is now considered a security threat to the Country's security procedures is also the source of many debates. The main objective of this article is to evaluate changes in China's national security strategy considering the Country's four generations of rulers, in the framework of China's security traditions and “comprehensive security. The main question posed in this article considers the ways in which China's national security Strategy has been defined and/or re-defined under the four generations of China's rulers.
The answer to this question is sought in an explanatory-analytical method, with due consideration of the “comprehensive security” theoretical framework of Barry Buzan and Ole Weaver of the Copenhagen School of thought (COPRI). This is done to evaluate the power of the principles of the Copenhagen School of thought to explain and predict the changes taken place in China's national security strategy.
The main hypothesis studied here is that securitizing and de-securitizing from Weaver's viewpoint and the constituents of comprehensive security are not, in most cases, able to evaluate China's security transformations
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Securitizing
- Desecuritizing
- Comprehensive security
- China's national security strategies
امیدوارنیا، محمدجواد. (1376). امنیت در قرن بیست و یکم. تهران: دفتر مطالعات سیاسی و بین الملل.
بوزان، بری. (1378). مردم، دولتها، هراس، تهران: مطالعات راهبردی.
تسه دونگ، مائو،.(1358). منتخب آثار. جلد چهارم، تهران: انتشارات سازمان انقلابی.
سلمانی، ...(1386). «گفتگوی علمی: اصول و مبانی تحلیل امنیت (یافتهها و کاستیهای مکتب کپنهاگ)». تهران: نگرش راهبردی، شماره 77-78، 139-154.
شاهنده، بهزاد،؛ طاهایی، سید جواد. (1383). چین نو: دنگ شیائوپینگ و اصلاحات، تهران: مرکز تحقیقات استراتژیک
داربی شر، یان دنیس. (1368). تحولات سیاسی در جمهوری خلق چین، ترجمه عباس هدایت وزیری، تهران: انتشارات و آموزش انقلاب اسلامی.
کلربرژر، ماری. (1368). جمهوری خلق چین: 1985-1949. ترجمه عباس آگاهی. تهران: معاونت فرهنگی آستان قدس رضوی.
.محروق، فاطمه (1391). «راهبرد امنیت ملی چین در دوران مائو، دنگ و پسادنگ: تداوم و تغییر امنیتی سازی و امنیتی زدایی». پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد روابط بین الملل، دانشگاه تهران.
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do Things with words? Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Buzan, B. (1991).'Peoples States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Buzan, B., & Little, R. (1996). Re conceptualizing anarchy: structural realism meets world history. European Journal of International Relations, 2, 4, 499-516.
Buzan, B., & Waever, O. (1997). 'Slippery? cotradictory? socialogically untenable? The Copenhagen School replies'. Review of International Studies. 23, 241-250.
Buzan, B., & Waever, O., & Wild, J.(1998). Security: A new framework for analysis, Boulder, Co: Lynne Reiner.
China's Government's Office. (1991). China’s national defense white paper. China's Government's Official Web portal. Retrieved from www.Gov.cn
-----. (1993). China’s national defense white paper. China's Government's Official Web portal. Retrieved from www.Gov.cn
-----. (1995). China’s national defense white paper. China's Government's Official Web portal. Retrieved from www.Gov.cn
-----. (1998). China’s national defense white paper. China's Government's Official Web portal. Retrieved from www.Gov.cn
-----. (2001). Identity, communities and foreign policy, in Lene Hansen & Ole Wæver (Eds.). European Integration and National Identity: The challenge of the Nordic States, London: Routledge, 20-50.
-----. (2004). "Aberystwyth, Paris, Copenhagen New Schools in Security Theory and the Origins between Core and Periphery", Paper presented at the ISA Conference Montreal March.
-----. (2004). China’s national defense white paper. China's Government's Official Web portal. Retrieved from www.Gov.cn
-----. (2005). White Paper on Peaceful Development Road Published. China's Government's Official Web portal.
-----. (2007). The people's republic of China. Routledge Publisher, 1, 1182-1204.
-----. (2010). China’s national defense white paper. China's Government's Official Web portal.
-----. (2010).The people's republic of China. Routledge Publisher, 1, 1233-1236.
-----. (2011). The people's republic of China. Routledge Publisher, 1, 1244-1262.
National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) (2007, June 4).China's National Climate Change Program..National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). Retrieved from www.China .org.cn
China's Statistical Year book (2010). Various Edition. China Statics Press. Retrieved from http://www.stats.gov.cn
Chu,Y., Lo, C., & Myers, R. (Eds.).(2004). The New Chinese Leadership: Challenges and Opportunities after the 16th Party Congress. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Derrida, J. (1982). Margins of Philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Farber, A. D. (2011, August 25). 'The challenge of climate change adaptation: Learning from national planning efforts in Britain, China, and the USA'. Journal of Environmental Law,1-24.
Feng, H. (2005). "The Operational Code of Mao Zedong: Defensive or Offensive Realist?". Security Studies, 14.4.
Feng, X. (2005)." US factor in Japan becoming a military power". Trans. By open source center. Liaowang, 32.
Finkelstein, D. M. (2000).' China Reconsiders Its National Security: The Great Peace and Development Debate of 1999'. Arlington, VA: CNA Corporation.
Harding, H. (1997). The Chinese state in crisis, 1966—9. In The Politics of China: The Era of Mao and Deng. Second edition. Roderick, Macfarquhar Ed. Cambridge University Press.
Liu, X., & Gill, B. (2007). "Assessing China's response to the challenge of environmental health". Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
Minzner, C. (2006). Xinfang: 'An alternative to formal Chinese legal institutions'. Stanford Journal of International Law,42, no. 1, 133-5.
Scobell, A., & Wortzel, M. L. (2002, September). "China's gowing military power: perspectives on Security, ballistic missiles, and conventional capabilities". Strategic studies institute.
The Europa World Year book. (2005). The people's republic of China. Routledge Publisher, 1, 1138-1137.
The Europa World Year book. (2009). The people's republic of China. Routledge Publisher, 1, 1217-1236.
The National Intelligence Council. (2009, April). China: The impact of climate change to 2030. US National Intelligence Council (NIC). 2009-02D.
Tung-chou, K. (2002, October, 20). PLA takes charge of Taiwan Affairs Department to prepare for military action against Taiwan. In Hong Kong Singtao jihpao
Wæver, O. (1995). Securitization and Desecuritization”. In Lipschutz, R.D. On Security, New York: Columbia University Press.
Waever, O. (2004). Peace and Security – Two concepts and their relationship, In Guzzini, Stefano, Jung, Dietrich. Analysis and Copenhagen Peace Research. (London: Routledge), 51-65.
Waltz, K. N. (1989).The Origins of War in Neorealist Theory, in R. Rotberg and T. Rabb, (Eds.).The Order and Prevention of Major Wars. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, M. C. (2003). "Words, images, enemies: Securitization and international politics". International Studies Quarterly, 47, 511-531.
Yuejin, I. (Eds.). (2004). The Science of National Security. Beijing: China university of Political science and Law publishing house.
Zheng, Y., & Tok, S.k. (2007), October. "Harmonious society and harmonious world:" China's policy discourse under Hu Jintao. The University of Nottingham, China policy institute. Briefing Series. Issue 26. Retrieved from www.Chinapolicyinstitute.org
Zhou, X. (2006). Remarks on China's trade balance and exchange rate. CIRAS. Retrieved from www.pbc.gov.cn
)