پژوهش های روابط بین الملل

پژوهش های روابط بین الملل

رقابت آمریکا و چین در منطقه ژئوپلیتیکی آسیا – پاسیفیک

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استادیار علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.
2 دکتری علوم سیاسی، پژوهشگر سیاسی و مدرس گروه علوم سیاسی و روابط بین‌الملل دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
10.22034/irr.2025.568256.2815
چکیده
یکی از مسائل مهم در حوزه‌ی مطالعات راهبردی، رقابت امریکا و چین در محیط منطقه‌ای آسیا– پاسیفیک است. مسئله این است که راهبرد آمریکا به‌منظور ممانعت از خیزش چین و تبدیل‌شدن به چالشگر هژمون در محیط بین‌الملل چیست؟ به نظر می‌رسد که آمریکا با اتخاذ راهبرد هژمون گرایی نوین و با راهبرد موازنه فراساحلی و نفوذ در محیط منطقه‌ای آسیا– پاسیفیک، درصدد فشار و جلوگیری از قدرت‌یابی چین می‌باشد. یافته‌های پژوهش با رویکرد توصیفی- تحلیلی و روش کیفی بیانگر این است که قدرت هژمون به‌منظور ممانعت از ظهور هژمون نوین با قلمروسازی ژئوپلیتیکی سعی در ایجاد محدودیت برای بازیگران نوظهور می‌باشد. اساساً فضای ژئوپلیتیکی آسیا –پاسیفیک برای چین اهمیت ژئوپلیتیکی، استراتژیکی و ژئواکونومیکی داشته و درواقع این منطقه به‌مثابه پاشنه آشیل چین نیز عمل می‌کند. راهبرد کلان آمریکا در محیط منطقه‌ای آسیا – پاسیفیک با اتخاذ راهبرد موازنه فراساحلی از طریق مؤلفه‌هایی همچون ائتلاف و موازنه سازی، کوآد، اکوس و بازسازی جهانی بهتر طرح‌ریزی‌شده است. در مقابل راهبرد چین برای پیشبرد سیاست و اهداف خود نفوذ در مناطق و یافتن محیطی از طریق ابتکار کمربند – جاده و راه ابریشم نوین می‌باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

America and China competition in the Asia-Pacific geopolitical region

نویسندگان English

amir raoshan 1
Mohsen Jamshidi 2
1 Assistant Professor of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
2 Jamshidi PhD in Political Science, Political Researcher and Lecturer in the Department of Political Science and International Relations, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

One of the main issues that has attracted the attention of all analysts of the international system from the perspective of strategic studies is the competition between the United States and China in the Asia-Pacific regional environment. What parameters are affected by the United States' strategy to prevent China's rise and becoming a hegemon? It seems that the United States, by adopting a new hegemonic strategy and with a strategy of offshore balance and influence in the Asia-Pacific regional environment, is trying to pressure and prevent China from becoming a hegemon through specific patterns. The present study is of an applied type, with a qualitative-interpretative method and a descriptive-analytical approach. The findings of the study show that, according to geostrategic patterns, the United States, as a hegemon in the global geopolitical system, is afraid of the emergence of another hegemonic power (China) in the environment and is trying to limit this advance through geopolitical territorialization. The Asia-Pacific geopolitical space has geopolitical, geostrategic and geoeconomic importance for China and in fact this region acts as China's Achilles heel. The US's macro-strategic trends in the Asia-Pacific regional environment are planned by adopting a strategy of offshore balancing through components such as alliance and balancing, QUAD, ECOS and B3W better global reconstruction. In contrast, China's response to advance its strategy is, in short, a rise to hegemony and environmental opening through the Belt and Road Initiative and the New Silk Road.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

New hegemony
strategic competition
Asia-Pacific
geopolitics
remote balancing (offshore)
Akrami, Taha and Mohammadi Ramezani, Mustafa. (2024). A study of the strategic competition between America and China, a case study of the West Asian region. Middle East Studies, Spring, 31 (1), (serial 115), pp. 18-1. (In Persain).
Anaei, Abolfazal. (2024).China in the hegemonic relations of the post - American world system. Strategic Politics Research, Summer, 13 (49), pp. 236-195. (In Persain).
Brands, H. (2015). The limits of offshore balancing.
Brooks, S. G., & Wohlforth, W. C. (2005). International relations theory and the case against unilateralism. Perspectives on Politics, 3(3), 509-524.
Caverley, J. D. (2007). United States hegemony and the new economics of defense. Security studies, 16(4), 598-614.
Chauhdry, K. T., Aqib, S., & Wassan, I. A. (2025). Geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific: Strategic Competition, Alliances, and Regional Security. Research Journal for Social Affairs, 3(5), 503-520
Cheema, S. A. (2021). AUKUS. CISS Insight Journal, 9(2), P86-101.
Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. (2014). Reducing the risk of supply chain disruptions. MIT Sloan management review, 55(3), 73-80.
 Deng, X., Liang, L., Wu, F., Wang, Z., & He, S. (2022). A review of the balance of regional development in China from the perspective of development geography. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32(1), 3-22.
deSwielande, T. S. (2012). The reassertion of the United States in the Asia-Pacific region. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 42(1), 14.
Dongxiao, C., Liuqiang, S., Guoxing, W., Yu, Y., & Yanliang, L. (2021). China-US strategic collaboration: Four cases and their lessons. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 7(01), 13-60.
Ethier, W. J. (2002). Unilateralism in a multilateral world. The Economic Journal, 112(479), 266-292.
Faraji, Mohammad Reza. (2024). Complexity and Order of Regions; Orderly Transition of Regions in the Complex International System. World Politics, 13 (3), (serial 49), pp. 174-151. (In Persain).
Gohari Moghadam, Abuzar and Hazrati Razlighi, Mohammad Amin. (2019). The Prospects of the Possible Strategy of the United States in West Asia and Its Political Requirements. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, Special Issue, 12, pp. 153-128. (In Persain).
He, K., & Li, M. (2020). Understanding the dynamics of the Indo-Pacific: US–China strategic competition, regional actors, and beyond. International Affairs, 96(1), 1-7.
Hillman, J. E. (2020). The emperor’s new road: China and the project of the century. Yale University Press.
Karami, Jahangir and Shahmohammadi, Persia. (2019). Hegemony, Geopolitics and China-US Relations. Central Asia and the Caucasus, Spring, 105, pp. 160-133. (In Persain).
Khan, A., & Khan, S. N. (2022). BRI vs. B3W: A rivalry for economic hegemony: An archival research. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 61(1), 31-44.
Klaus, M. D. (2003). Dual-use free trade agreements: The contemporary alternative to high-tech export controls. Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y, 32, 105.
Mearsheimer, J. J., & Walt, S. M. (2016). The case for offshore balancing. Foreign Affairs, 95(4), 22.
Mearsheimer, John J., Stephen M. Walt (2016) “The Case for Offshore Balancing: A Superior U.S. Grand Strategy”, Foreign Affairs, July/August 2016, in: https:// www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2016-06-13.
Miller, T. (2019). China's Asian dream: Empire building along the new silk road. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Montgomery, J. D. (1993). The Asia-Pacific as an environmental region. The Journal of Developing Areas, 28(1), 3-12.
Moyer, J. D., Meisel, C. J., Matthews, A. S., Bohl, D., & Burrows, M. J. (2021). China-US Competition: Measuring Global Influence. Available at SSRN 3941475.
Qaderi Hojat, Mustafa and Ahmadi Dazav-e-Emami, Farzad. (2024). Geopolitical Foundations of US-China Competition in the Asia-Pacific. World Politics, Summer, 13 (2), (serial 48), pp. 81-53. (In Persain).
Raisi Nejad, Arash and Nematpour, Ali. (2024). Dragon in the desert: America and China competition in the Arab countries of the Middle East. Middle East Studies, Spring, 31 (1), (serial 115), pp. 31-1. (In Persain).
Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly - Deputy for Political and Legal Research, Office of Political Studies. (2019). The changing position of West Asia in US strategic documents and its consequences on Iran's national security. Khordad, Subject Code 260, Serial No. 16478.
Talebi, Abbasali. (2024). An Evaluation of the United States’ Middle East Policies in the Middle East with a Focus on the Biden Administration. Foreign Policy, Summer, 38 (2), pp. 144-123. (In Persain).
Wang, Y. (2016). Belt and road initiative: What will China offer the world in its rise. New World Press.
Zhang, J. (2024). China’s Perspective. Further ASEAN–China Cooperation for Joint Prosperity: Envisioning ACFTA 3.0 in the Digital Era, 225.
Zwolensky, T. S. (2010). Deployment Logistics and the Impact of Seabasing: An Army Perspective.