<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>The Iranian Association of International Studies</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Relations Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8444</Issn>
				<Volume>6</Volume>
				<Issue>20</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Legal Diplomacy and Iranian Nuclear Problem Solving</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Legal Diplomacy and Iranian Nuclear Problem Solving</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>195</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>226</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">45872</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bayeemehr</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Chalous Branch</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Diplomacy, as old as intergovernmental relations, never belonged to any particular subject and was never modeled on and always discussed by academic circles of binary law and international relations.&lt;br /&gt;In this article we will take a new look at diplomacy as legal diplomacy, and the question of whether legal diplomacy will resolve the Iranian nuclear issue will be answered. It should be noted that in an international law system based on profit-oriented positivism and political realism, nothing can replace game theory. Legal diplomacy is the same necessity of applying international law and reasoning in the negotiation arena that has been the focus of Iranian nuclear negotiators. In legal diplomacy, negotiators should pursue their goals and interests by using lawsuits against their counterparts based on existing international law principles as well as principles that the claimant considers to be legal principles.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Diplomacy, as old as intergovernmental relations, never belonged to any particular subject and was never modeled on and always discussed by academic circles of binary law and international relations.&lt;br /&gt;In this article we will take a new look at diplomacy as legal diplomacy, and the question of whether legal diplomacy will resolve the Iranian nuclear issue will be answered. It should be noted that in an international law system based on profit-oriented positivism and political realism, nothing can replace game theory. Legal diplomacy is the same necessity of applying international law and reasoning in the negotiation arena that has been the focus of Iranian nuclear negotiators. In legal diplomacy, negotiators should pursue their goals and interests by using lawsuits against their counterparts based on existing international law principles as well as principles that the claimant considers to be legal principles.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Legal Diplomacy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Iran's Nuclear Issue</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Geneva Agreement</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Brigham</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Right to Enrich</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.iisajournals.ir/article_45872_e96e43446dc54b1e2a36367f390bdb0c.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
