<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>The Iranian Association of International Studies</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Relations Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8444</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>12</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Trend of Application of Veto Right at the Security Council (1946-2009): The Maintenance of International Peace and Security or Protection of the Permanent Members’ Interests?</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Trend of Application of Veto Right at the Security Council (1946-2009): The Maintenance of International Peace and Security or Protection of the Permanent Members’ Interests?</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>9</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>34</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">41952</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Majid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bozorgmehri</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor Imam Khomeini International University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Nazanin</FirstName>
					<LastName>Khorrami</LastName>
<Affiliation>Instructor of Islamic Azad University, Taleghan Branch</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>With the establishment of the UNO in 1945 and consequently the Security Council, the functioning of the Organization has always been affected with the policies and stances of the permanent members enjoying the privilege of veto power. The states that are entitled with this privilege have acted on the basis of their national interests and their relations with other countries regarding the international issues and resorting to the veto power at the Security Council. Our principal question is on the basis of the detailed examination of cases of veto application in half a century, whether this right has been in accordance with the main function and duty of the SC which is maintaining international peace and security or its application has been used for protection of the interests of the permanent members and their allies? While explaining the problem, the article applies critical theory in International Relations for the theoretical framework of this research and later on goes to analyze the detailed data of the cases of application of veto. The conclusion proves that the veto right has been almost used for ensuring the interests of the great powers and their allies rather than keeping international peace and securities</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">With the establishment of the UNO in 1945 and consequently the Security Council, the functioning of the Organization has always been affected with the policies and stances of the permanent members enjoying the privilege of veto power. The states that are entitled with this privilege have acted on the basis of their national interests and their relations with other countries regarding the international issues and resorting to the veto power at the Security Council. Our principal question is on the basis of the detailed examination of cases of veto application in half a century, whether this right has been in accordance with the main function and duty of the SC which is maintaining international peace and security or its application has been used for protection of the interests of the permanent members and their allies? While explaining the problem, the article applies critical theory in International Relations for the theoretical framework of this research and later on goes to analyze the detailed data of the cases of application of veto. The conclusion proves that the veto right has been almost used for ensuring the interests of the great powers and their allies rather than keeping international peace and securities</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">UN</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Security Council</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Veto Power</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">International Peace and Security</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.iisajournals.ir/article_41952_afa2f2152cb9870c9906ec0b81f3e22c.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>The Iranian Association of International Studies</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Relations Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8444</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>12</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Obama Neo-Idealist Policy and Its Impact on the UN Functional Crisis</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Obama Neo-Idealist Policy and Its Impact on the UN Functional Crisis</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>35</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>58</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">41953</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Gholamreza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Karimi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Faculty member of Kharazmi University</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-3139-9504</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>From the very beginning of establishment of the United Nations that America gave its support to the organization, it was this perception that this international institution would be the most effective and legitimate tool for imposing American values at the global level and protection of American interests. However, at the present, many experts believe that the UN has failed in its main function which is to protect and maintain international peace and security. Considering this point, this paper seeks to examine the functional crisis of the UN from the Neo-Idealist perspective during the Obama’s presidency. The logic of the Neo-Idealism requires the US foreign policy be based on the multilateralism and cooperation which would make the presence of US in the international organizations such as the UN necessary in order to ensure its national interests. Having considered the Neo-Idealist perspective as the most suitable perspective for examining the factors in functional crisis of the UN compared with other approaches in International Relations, it is tried to apply the advantages of this perspective in order to examine the UN at the functional level. With this approach, non-democratic action of the UN and weakening of the role of the UN by US such the case of the Iranian nuclear program as the factors of the UN functional crisis during the Obama’s presidency are recognized and studied. This article is based on the analytical and explanatory method</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">From the very beginning of establishment of the United Nations that America gave its support to the organization, it was this perception that this international institution would be the most effective and legitimate tool for imposing American values at the global level and protection of American interests. However, at the present, many experts believe that the UN has failed in its main function which is to protect and maintain international peace and security. Considering this point, this paper seeks to examine the functional crisis of the UN from the Neo-Idealist perspective during the Obama’s presidency. The logic of the Neo-Idealism requires the US foreign policy be based on the multilateralism and cooperation which would make the presence of US in the international organizations such as the UN necessary in order to ensure its national interests. Having considered the Neo-Idealist perspective as the most suitable perspective for examining the factors in functional crisis of the UN compared with other approaches in International Relations, it is tried to apply the advantages of this perspective in order to examine the UN at the functional level. With this approach, non-democratic action of the UN and weakening of the role of the UN by US such the case of the Iranian nuclear program as the factors of the UN functional crisis during the Obama’s presidency are recognized and studied. This article is based on the analytical and explanatory method</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">United States</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Barack Obama</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Neoidealism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Iranian Nuclear Issue</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.iisajournals.ir/article_41953_71d2f46bae7fdd24ba0873898cc77fb6.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>The Iranian Association of International Studies</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Relations Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8444</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>12</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Indo-Pakistani Conflict after the 1998 and the Great Powers’ Crisis Management</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Indo-Pakistani Conflict after the 1998 and the Great Powers’ Crisis Management</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>59</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>98</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">41954</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyyed Ahmad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Fateminejad</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This article aims to study great powers’ contribution to the management of Indo-Pakistani conflict after 1998. The main question here is as to how the great powers have engaged in the process of the conflict management during 1998-2010? It is assumed that the great powers have played their roles and been present in this conflict. The above question is addressed through using theory of “great powers management” and “dyadic/extra-dyadic” analysis. The main hypothesis here is that United States, Russia, and China as three great powers have contributed to the management of Indo-Pakistani conflict by exercising their local preponderance, respecting each other spheres of influence, and doing joint actions. The hypothesis is tested by post-event methods. As such, great powers’ role is tested during three case studies, i.e. Kargil War 1999, great stand-off 2001-2, and unfinished confrontation 2008. Lastly, these cases confirm that great powers have succeeded to manage Kargil war 1999 but they did not get any meaningful success in the other two</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This article aims to study great powers’ contribution to the management of Indo-Pakistani conflict after 1998. The main question here is as to how the great powers have engaged in the process of the conflict management during 1998-2010? It is assumed that the great powers have played their roles and been present in this conflict. The above question is addressed through using theory of “great powers management” and “dyadic/extra-dyadic” analysis. The main hypothesis here is that United States, Russia, and China as three great powers have contributed to the management of Indo-Pakistani conflict by exercising their local preponderance, respecting each other spheres of influence, and doing joint actions. The hypothesis is tested by post-event methods. As such, great powers’ role is tested during three case studies, i.e. Kargil War 1999, great stand-off 2001-2, and unfinished confrontation 2008. Lastly, these cases confirm that great powers have succeeded to manage Kargil war 1999 but they did not get any meaningful success in the other two</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Great Powers</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Conflict Management</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">India</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Pakistan</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Dyadic Rivalry</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.iisajournals.ir/article_41954_ba1518de09ba164aa79f11714ca04be9.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>The Iranian Association of International Studies</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Relations Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8444</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>12</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The role of the African Union in the settlement of the Libyan Crisis</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The role of the African Union in the settlement of the Libyan Crisis</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>99</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>126</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">41955</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mehdi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Abbasi Sarmadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Law Department of Kharazmi University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>With the transition from “Organization of African Unity&quot; to &quot;African Union&quot;, the &quot;African Problems&quot; should appeal the &quot;African solution&quot;. The Libyan crisis was a serious test for this strategy on the ground. Since it aimed at not only one of the corrupt and enduring regimes of the continent but also was considered as a crisis which had endangered the peace and security at the regional and international level. In this context, the present research examines the role of the African Union as a rooted regional organization regarding the management of the mentioned crisis through a politico – legal approach. For this purpose, after a brief reference to the developments of the Union and the reasons for the Libyan Crisis, the reaction of the Organization on the crisis by the measures of the “Security and Peace Council” as well as the “ad hoc Committee” is followed in order to show that in spite of the fact that the African Union particularly distinguished itself from the OAU by creating the “Security and Peace Council” and emphasized on its special attention to the question of peace and security yet, due to the visional, political, financial and decision-taking weaknesses, the Organization could not use all its capacities in the process of the settlement of the Libyan Crisis. As a result, it couldn`t realize the strategy of “the African resolution for the African problems</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">With the transition from “Organization of African Unity&quot; to &quot;African Union&quot;, the &quot;African Problems&quot; should appeal the &quot;African solution&quot;. The Libyan crisis was a serious test for this strategy on the ground. Since it aimed at not only one of the corrupt and enduring regimes of the continent but also was considered as a crisis which had endangered the peace and security at the regional and international level. In this context, the present research examines the role of the African Union as a rooted regional organization regarding the management of the mentioned crisis through a politico – legal approach. For this purpose, after a brief reference to the developments of the Union and the reasons for the Libyan Crisis, the reaction of the Organization on the crisis by the measures of the “Security and Peace Council” as well as the “ad hoc Committee” is followed in order to show that in spite of the fact that the African Union particularly distinguished itself from the OAU by creating the “Security and Peace Council” and emphasized on its special attention to the question of peace and security yet, due to the visional, political, financial and decision-taking weaknesses, the Organization could not use all its capacities in the process of the settlement of the Libyan Crisis. As a result, it couldn`t realize the strategy of “the African resolution for the African problems</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">African Union &amp;ndash</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Libyan Crisis &amp;ndash</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Security &amp;</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Peace Council&amp;ndash</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">ad hoc Committee &amp;ndash</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">African resolu</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.iisajournals.ir/article_41955_e982a45f2b64cd868876c6d01fc2a99e.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>The Iranian Association of International Studies</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Relations Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8444</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>12</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Causes and Consequences of Bosnia and Herzegovina Membership in the EU</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Causes and Consequences of Bosnia and Herzegovina Membership in the EU</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>127</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>160</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">41956</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bagheri Dolatabadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Political Science, Yasuj University</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-4584-5870</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The expansion of EU has been one of the most important issues in International Relations since 1990s up to now. Bosnia and Herzegovina is one of the candidates that has started its efforts for accession to EU from year 2000 and it still faces some problems in this way. While this demand is followed by Bosnian authorities, European leaders emphasize on accelerating reforms that have been required. Therefore, the question this paper seeks to address is that what are the reasons and consequences of the membership of Bosnia and Herzegovina in EU? The findings of the paper emphasize the return to the Europe Union and realization of peace and stability in the country as the main reasons and weakening the Islamic identity and political-economic reforms as the most important consequences of the accession. In this context, this research applies the constructive approach based on analytical method</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The expansion of EU has been one of the most important issues in International Relations since 1990s up to now. Bosnia and Herzegovina is one of the candidates that has started its efforts for accession to EU from year 2000 and it still faces some problems in this way. While this demand is followed by Bosnian authorities, European leaders emphasize on accelerating reforms that have been required. Therefore, the question this paper seeks to address is that what are the reasons and consequences of the membership of Bosnia and Herzegovina in EU? The findings of the paper emphasize the return to the Europe Union and realization of peace and stability in the country as the main reasons and weakening the Islamic identity and political-economic reforms as the most important consequences of the accession. In this context, this research applies the constructive approach based on analytical method</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">EU</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Bosnia and Herzegovina</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">accession</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Constitution Treaty</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Dayton Peace</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Constructivism Theory</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.iisajournals.ir/article_41956_eba279b3c1dea40075f63c5058684420.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>The Iranian Association of International Studies</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Relations Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8444</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>12</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Analysis of Globalization Trend Applying KOF Index in Iran and Its Comparison with Middle East Countries</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Analysis of Globalization Trend Applying KOF Index in Iran and Its Comparison with Middle East Countries</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>161</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>194</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">41957</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Nader</FirstName>
					<LastName>Zali</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Urban Planning, University of Guilan, Faculty of Art and Architecture</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Esmail</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghasemi</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD student of Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Dehaghan Branch</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyyed Hossein</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mortazavi</LastName>
<Affiliation>MSc International Relations Zanjan Islamic Azad University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Nayer</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ebrahimi</LastName>
<Affiliation>M.Sc. Student in Sociology, Tabriz Azad University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This paper examines the globalization’s indicators in three economic, social and political contexts. The most important indicators which have been developed to assess globalization are the Foreign Policy Index, the Heritage Foundation and the Fraser Institute Indexes. Each of these indicators has evaluated the complex social relations between countries through a specific method. However, one of the most important indexes considered in this context is KOF Index which has been providing Globalization Index since 2002. Despite some of the shortcomings, this index is still considered as a valid reference to be applied for calculating the different aspects of social, economic and political degree of globalization in the world. In this research the effort will be focused on the changing trend of the globalization index in the Asian countries with emphasis on Iran and will attempt to analyze Iran as a country with a very important geo-political situation in the region. The results show that all the studied countries have been easily absorbed in the globalization flow by the West and there is a common alignment between the countries in this area. But Iran has independently resisted against the globalization trend by maintaining its political, social and economic identity while applying its positive aspects</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This paper examines the globalization’s indicators in three economic, social and political contexts. The most important indicators which have been developed to assess globalization are the Foreign Policy Index, the Heritage Foundation and the Fraser Institute Indexes. Each of these indicators has evaluated the complex social relations between countries through a specific method. However, one of the most important indexes considered in this context is KOF Index which has been providing Globalization Index since 2002. Despite some of the shortcomings, this index is still considered as a valid reference to be applied for calculating the different aspects of social, economic and political degree of globalization in the world. In this research the effort will be focused on the changing trend of the globalization index in the Asian countries with emphasis on Iran and will attempt to analyze Iran as a country with a very important geo-political situation in the region. The results show that all the studied countries have been easily absorbed in the globalization flow by the West and there is a common alignment between the countries in this area. But Iran has independently resisted against the globalization trend by maintaining its political, social and economic identity while applying its positive aspects</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">globalization</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Iran</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">KOF Index</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Middle East Countries</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.iisajournals.ir/article_41957_fa975b1b8848425e1563e19b836581f4.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>The Iranian Association of International Studies</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Relations Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8444</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>12</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Historical Sociology and Cognitive illusions of the Waltzian Tradition of International Relations</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Historical Sociology and Cognitive illusions of the Waltzian Tradition of International Relations</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>195</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>220</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">41958</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ghodrat</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ahmadian</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Political Science, Razi University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This article tries to offer a critical examination of the Waltzian tradition of International Relations based on the historical sociology perspective. The main question which we seek to address here is that what methodological weaknesses the historical sociology perspective exposes from the Waltzian theory of International Relations and what solution it can offer in order to save itself from these weaknesses. Due to its abstract theoretical discipline of understanding the international phenomena, the Waltzian tradition of international relations is envisaged with four cognitive illusions including reification illusion, naturalization illusion, immutability illusion and isomorphic illusion. These four illusions are obvious results of ahistoricality and asociality of Waltzian theory of international politics. In this regard, the historical sociology by stressing on time (historical) and social factors and forces is seeking to capture more precise methods of perceiving the international politics</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This article tries to offer a critical examination of the Waltzian tradition of International Relations based on the historical sociology perspective. The main question which we seek to address here is that what methodological weaknesses the historical sociology perspective exposes from the Waltzian theory of International Relations and what solution it can offer in order to save itself from these weaknesses. Due to its abstract theoretical discipline of understanding the international phenomena, the Waltzian tradition of international relations is envisaged with four cognitive illusions including reification illusion, naturalization illusion, immutability illusion and isomorphic illusion. These four illusions are obvious results of ahistoricality and asociality of Waltzian theory of international politics. In this regard, the historical sociology by stressing on time (historical) and social factors and forces is seeking to capture more precise methods of perceiving the international politics</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">historical sociology</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Cognitive Illusion</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Waltzian Theory</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Critical Approach</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">historicism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sociality</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.iisajournals.ir/article_41958_103b4423624ec023c46fa2d81680b636.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>The Iranian Association of International Studies</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Relations Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8444</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>12</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Features of Appropriate Rule in Private International Law</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Features of Appropriate Rule in Private International Law</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>221</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>242</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">41959</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Maghsoudi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Law Department of Guilan University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The rules of Private International Law have little religious and national roots compared to other rules of the domestic law and this advantage has facilitated natural progress of this branch of law in the context of historical developments. This article analytically examines the rules of conflict resolution and their objectives in the legal and economic framework while considering the political requirements and necessities derived from proximity with Public International Law in order to reveal the features of appropriate rule in International Private Law through assembling the different and yet contradictory needs. Dogmatic thinking and retelling of the past rules in this area do not have any religious and historical justification and caused losses to the private persons and eventually to the states</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The rules of Private International Law have little religious and national roots compared to other rules of the domestic law and this advantage has facilitated natural progress of this branch of law in the context of historical developments. This article analytically examines the rules of conflict resolution and their objectives in the legal and economic framework while considering the political requirements and necessities derived from proximity with Public International Law in order to reveal the features of appropriate rule in International Private Law through assembling the different and yet contradictory needs. Dogmatic thinking and retelling of the past rules in this area do not have any religious and historical justification and caused losses to the private persons and eventually to the states</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Appropriate Rule</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Predictability</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Legitimate Expectations</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Governmental Policies</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.iisajournals.ir/article_41959_2beb774329b2f0fe5e7952cba91c0af7.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
