پژوهش های روابط بین الملل
تحول سیاست خارجی هند در حوزه جنوب شرقی آسیا
نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استاد گروه علوم سیاسی دانشگاه گیلان
2 دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین الملل دانشگاه گیلان
چکیده
هند از 1947 تا اواخر دهه 1980، سیاست جهان سومگرایی را نسبت به حوزه جنوب شرقی آسیا در پیش گرفته بود که با مشخصههای کلیدی تلاش برای همبستگی جهان سوم، خودبسندگی اقتصادی و عدم تعهد تعریف میشد. از اواخر دهه1980، سیاست خارجی جهان سوم گرایانه هند نسبت به حوزه جنوب شرقی آسیا به سیاست عملگرایی اقتصادی دگرگون شده است. این مقاله با طرح پرسش ذیل به تبیین تغییر سیاست خارجی هند در این منطقه می‌پردازد. پرسش این است که، چه عواملی سبب تغییر سیاست خارجی هند از جهان سومگرایی به عملگرایی اقتصادی در حوزه جنوب شرقی آسیا شده است؟ در پاسخ به پرسش اصلی مقاله، این فرضیه طرح شده است که افول نهروئیسم و رشد دیدگاههای رقیب، تغییرساختاری سیستم بین‌المللی از دوقطبی به تک قطبی و رشد فزاینده نفوذ اقتصادی منطقهای چین، سبب دگرگونی سیاست خارجی هند در جنوب شرقی آسیا از جهان سومگرایی به عملگرایی اقتصادی شده است. در این پژوهش از روش تبیینی استفاده شده و نظریه موازنه منافع راهنمای بررسی فرضیه قرار گرفته است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Indian foreign policy developments In Southeast Asia
نویسندگان [English]
- Reza Simbar 1
- Sajad Bahrami Moghadam 2
1 Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Guilan
2 PhD student in International Relations, University of Guilan
چکیده [English]
Since independence in 1947 until 1980s, India had taken a third worldism foreign policy towards the Southeast Asia which determine by key components of third world solidarity, non-alignment, and economic self-sufficiency.in this region, since the late 1980s, Indias foreign policy objective has changed from third worldism to economic pragmatism. This article attempts to explain the change in the foreign policy of India in the Southeast Asia address the following question. The question is based on how the changes in Indias foreign policy toward the Southeast Asia from third worldism to economic pragmatism has happened and what are the key factors behind that. In response to this question, this hypothesis is designed that the collapse of Nehroaism and rise of others perspectives, structural changes in the international system from bipolarity into unipolarity and Chinas growing regional economic influence, has transformed Indias foreign policy from third worldism to economic pragmatism. The explanationery method and theory of balance of interests have been used to investigate the hypothesis of this article.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- India
- the Southeast Asia
- Third Worldism
- Econom ic Pragmatism
Bajpai, K. Shankar. (1992). ‘India in 1991: New Beginnings’, Asian Survey 32 (2), February: 207–216.
Bhattacharya, Anushree. (2016). "India's Joint Naval Exercises in the ASEAN Region." Institute of Peace & Conflict Studies.
Bhagwati, Jagdish. (1993). ‘Negotiating Trade Blocs’, India Today, 15 July: 65.
Bhattacharya, B.B. (1992). India’s Economic Crises: Debt Burden and Specialization. New Delhi: B.R. Publishing.
Balasubramanian, Aditya. (2013). From Socialism to Swatranta: Market Liberalism in India, 1943-70. Diss.,Harvard University
Coedes, George. (1968). The Indianized States of Southeast Asia. Honolulu: East-West Center Press.
Chaterji, A. (2015). Violent gods: Hindu nationalism in India's present: Narratives from Orissa. Gurgaon, India: Three Essays Collective.
Dong, Zhang. (2006). ‘India Looks East: Strategies and Impact’, AUSAID Working Paper, September, accessed from:
http://www.ausaid.gov.au/Publications/Documents/india_east.pdf (accessed on 17 October 2010).
Dixit, J.N. (1996). My South Block Years: Memoirs of a Foreign Secretary. New Delhi: UBSPD.
Daweewarn, Dawee. (1982). Brahmanism in South-East Asia. New Delhi: Sterling.
Export Import Data Bank, Department of Commerce, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Government of India; http://commerce.nic.in/eidb/default.asp
Farthapratin Pal and Mitali Dasgupta. (2015). "The ASEAN – India Free Trade Agreement: An Assessment", Economics Political Weekly, vol. XLIV, No .30, Sept. 19, pp. 11-17.
Ghoshal, Baladas, ed. (1996). India and Southeast Asia: Challenges and Opportunities. New Delhi: Konark Publishers.
Haokip Thongkholal. (2011). India's Look East Policy: Its Evolution and Approach, South Asian Survey, 18(2): 239–257
Hall, D. G. E. (1981, 4th edition). A History of South-East Asia. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Junhua, Wang, and Zhang Jianzhong. (2015). "Study on the China-ASEAN Cooperation of Economy and Trade under the Background of the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road ;Journal of International Trade, V.3.1.PP.12-27.
Leur, J. C. van. (1955). Indonesian Trade and Society: Essays in Asian Social and Economic History. The Hague: W. van Hoeve.
Mishra, Patit Paban. (2001). Trans-National Migration: Study of Indian Culture in Transit. NBO: New Delhi, in press.
Nehru, Jawaharlal. (1961). India’s Foreign Policy: Selected Speeches, September-April 1946.
Nehru, Jawaharlal. The Discovery of India, (First published Signet Press, Calcutta
1946, Reprint 2004, Penguin, New Delhi)
Naidu, G.V.C. (1996). ‘India and Southeast Asia’, World Focus, 17(10–12), October–December: 82–84.
Nanda, Prakash. (2003). Rediscovering Asia: Evolution of India’s Look-East Policy. New Delhi: Lancer.
Ollapally, Deepa M., and Rajesh Rajagopalan. (2012)."India: Foreign policy perspectives of an ambiguous power." Worldview of Aspiring Powers: Domestic Foreign Policy Debates in China, India, Iran, Japan, and Russia, edited by Henry R. Nau and Deepa M. Ollapally. Oxford: Oxford University Press
‘Overview of ASEAN-India Dialogue Relations’; Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
http://www.asean.org/asean/external-relations/india/item/overview-of-asean-india-dialogue-relations
Panet, Hresh. (2016). Is India Developing a Strategy for Power? The Washington Quarterly,V38. N.4 pp. 99–113.
Palit, Amitendu. (2015). “India-Southeast Asia Relations: Enhancing Mutual Benefits,” Brookings India IMPACT, Series. Brookings Institution India Center.
Qin, Fengming, Tao Xu, and Zhaoyong Zhang. (2016). "Economic Cooperation and Interdependence Between China and ASEAN: Two to Tango?" Chinese Global Production Networks in ASEAN. Springer International Publishing.
Rao, Manjushree, ed. (1996). India's Cultural Relations with South-East Asia. Delhi: Sharada Publishing House.
Schweller, Randall L. (1994). "Bandwagoning for profit: Bringing the revisionist state back in." International Security: 72-107.
Schweller, Randall L. )2010(. Unanswered threats: political constraints on the balance of power. Princeton University Press,
Schweller, Randall L. (1999). "Managing the rise of great powers: history and theory." Engaging China: The management of an emerging power.Rutledg.
Schweller, Randall L., and Xiaoyu Pu. (2011). "After unipolarity: China's visions of international order in an era of US decline." International Security, 36(1): 41-72.
Schweller, Randall. (2011). "Emerging powers in an age of disorder." Global Governance, 17(3), 285-297.
Schweller, Randall L. (2001). "The problem of international order revisited: A review essay." International Security, 26(1), 161-186.
Schweller, Randall L. (2014). "China’s Aspirations and the Clash of Nationalisms in East Asia: A Neoclassical Realist Examination." International Journal of Korean Unification Studies. 23(2).PP.71-104.
Sardesai, D. R. (1968). India's Foreign Policy in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Singh, L. J. Bahadur, ed. (1982). Indians in Southeast Asia. New Delhi: Sterling.
Song, Guoyou, and Wen Jin Yuan. (2012). "China's Free Trade Agreement Strategies." The Washington Quarterly, 35(4), 107-119
Vajpayee, Atal. (1998). ‘Letter’ [to William Clinton], New York Times, 13 May.
Indo-Asian News Service (IANS), “India Needs Policy to Look East, Link West:
Narendra Modi,” Deccan Herald, 25 September 2014,
http://www.deccanherald.com/content/432698/india-needs-policy-look east.html.
Mohan Malik. (2014) “The Indo-Pacific Maritime Domain” Indo-Pacific: Perspectives from China, India and the United States, (London: Rowman & Littlefield).
Raja Mohan, Samudra Manthan. (2012). Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Indo-Pacific, (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace).
)