International Relations Researches

International Relations Researches

Internal Factors Influencing State-Building and Nation-Building in Afghanistan: An Expert Perspective (2001–2022)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Political Science and International Relations, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Gilan
2 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Guilan
10.22034/irr.2025.540497.2748
Abstract
The present study aims to identify the internal factors influencing the process of state–nation building in Afghanistan from 2001 to 2022, based on the perspectives of university professors and international relations experts. This research was conducted through in-depth interviews with 15 university professors and international relations specialists. The study is grounded in a conceptual theoretical framework that integrates concepts such as fragile state, social constructivism, elite circulation, and mosaic society. Using thematic analysis, the research identifies the most significant internal factors affecting the state–nation building process in Afghanistan from the viewpoint of academic experts and international relations scholars. The central question of the study is: which elements and components do university professors and international relations experts consider the most important internal factors in state–nation building in Afghanistan between 2001 and 2022? According to the findings, participants generally highlighted four major themes: the rapid growth of media, the formation of an electoral system, the social and political participation of women, and the emergence of civil society over the past two decades as key internal factors in the state–nation building process. However, respondents also noted that all these influential factors faced significant challenges, including a fragile state, lack of rule of law, administrative corruption, and dependence on foreign support. The results indicate that during the two decades of the republican system, the process of state–nation building was undermined and ultimately failed due to the intensification and .
Keywords

 
Alem, A., & Ensafi, M. (2018). Understanding the transition from structuralism to post-structuralism. Politics Quarterly, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, 48(1), Spring (59-76), In Persian.   
Abedi Ardakani, M. (2009). Pareto and the idea of elitism. Political-Economic Information, 269–270 (198-212), In Persian.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V (2006), Using thematic analysis in Psychology, Qualitative Research in in Psychology, Taylor and Francis.
Ebrahimi, S. (2018). Factors contributing to state fragility in Afghanistan (Master’s thesis, University of Mazandaran, Department of Political Science), In Persian.
Farzan, A. Sh. (2002). Afghanistan: From resistance to victory. Mashhad: Ahmad Shah Farzan Publishing, In Persian.
Fayzi, M. M. (2016). Identity, religion, and nation-building in Israel (Master’s thesis, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Department of Regional Studies), In Persian.
Haghighi, Sh. (2008). Transition from modernity. Tehran: Agah Publishing, In Persian.
Javadi, M. A., & Nikpey, A. (2010). The idea and concept of structuralism: A study of Saussure and Lévi-Strauss. Ma’refat-e Farhangi-e Ejtemaei, 3 (177-204), In Persian.
Jafari, H. A., et al. (2011). Thematic analysis and theme networks: A simple and effective method for explaining patterns in qualitative data. Strategic Management Thought, 10 (151-198), In Persian.
Lindlof, T., & Taylor, B. (2009). Qualitative communication research methods (A. Giviyan, Trans.). Tehran: Hamshahri Publishing, In Persian.
Nigel king and Christin Horrocks (2010), Qualitative Interviews Require careful ethical consideration.
Niyakouei, S. A., & Pirmohammadi, S. (2019). Fragile state of Iraq and the intervention of regional and transregional powers (2011–2018). Iranian Journal of International Politics, 1 (191-216) In Persian.
Noormohammadi, M., & Fasihi Dolatshahi, M. A. (2017). Explaining the factors behind the failure of the post-Taliban Afghan state through the lens of regional security complex theory. Political Sociology of the Islamic World, 1 (175-202) In Persian.
Migdal, Joel, S (1988), Strong Societies and Weak States-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World Princeton, University Press.
Roche, G. (1995). Social changes (M. Vosoughi, Trans., 6th ed.). Tehran: Ney Publishing.
Sadeqi, H. (2018). The role of political elites in political convergence and divergence in Afghanistan (1979–2016) (Master’s thesis, University of Birjand, Department of Political Science) In Persian.
Taheri, M. (2008). Elites and elitism. Journal of Social Science Education, 39 (23-42) In Persian.
Vaezi, H. (2012). Afghanistan and the incomplete structures of national identity. Tehran: Tehran Publishing, In Persian.
Wendt, A. (1992), Anarchy is what states Make of it: the Social Construction of Power Politics, International Organization, Cambridge University