International Relations Researches

International Relations Researches

A Comparative Study of Political Legitimation Patterns in the Buyid and Seljuk States: Sacred, Sultanic, Bureaucratic, and Social Legitimacy

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
mahdia vahabi 1
mohammad sheikhahmadi 2
Kaivan shafei 2
amir abdulahi 3
1 Department of History, Sa.C, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran
2 Department of History, Sa.C, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
3 Department of History, Mak.C., Islamic Azad University, Maku, Iran.
10.22034/irr.2026.579337.2838
Abstract
Political legitimacy in the Buyid and Seljuk polities was constructed through multifaceted and diverse mechanisms. This research investigates how these two distinct dynasties, with their unique backgrounds and structures, transitioned from wielding military power and local or tribal influence to establishing recognized and legitimate rule within the Iranian-Islamic societal framework. It further explores the specific instruments employed in solidifying this legitimacy. Consequently, this study seeks to answer how the Buyid and Seljuk states utilized cultural, religious, administrative, and social tools to legitimize their sultanates and power, and what impact these endeavors had on the stability and acceptance of their regimes.
Findings indicate that the Buyid dynasty cultivated an identity-based and regional legitimacy by emphasizing local lineage claims, reviving ancient Iranian kingship traditions, developing educational institutions, and implementing cultural and infrastructural policies. The Seljuk state, conversely, established a more institutionalized, layered, and encompassing legitimacy—leading to long-term stability and acceptance—by synthesizing Persianate and Islamic heritage, supporting the Abbasid Caliphate, organizing a centralized bureaucracy, and founding the Nizamiyya madrasas. In both dynasties, the interplay between institutions, elites, cultural and religious instruments, and military might played a decisive role in reinforcing legitimacy and ensuring social acceptance of their sovereignty. Employing a historical-analytical approach, this research comparatively examines the patterns of legitimacy during the Buyid and Seljuk periods. Data collection and analysis were conducted through the study of primary historical sources (such as chronicles and contemporary texts) and secondary scholarly literature.
Introduction
The concept of political legitimacy is central to understanding political order, particularly within the historical context of Iran and the greater Islamic world during the medieval era. This study analyzes the Buyid and Seljuk dynasties, focusing on the dimensions of legitimacy that characterize their governing frameworks. Legitimacy encompasses a reciprocal relationship between the "right to rule" and societal acceptance of that right, encompassing various sources of authority. As defined by Lipset, legitimacy is the capacity of a political system to foster the belief that existing institutions best serve societal interests (Lipset, 2004). Weber presents legitimacy as rooted in the belief in the normative validity of authority and the internal acceptance of rulers by the commanded (Weber, 1988). Political legitimacy goes beyond mere legality; it operates as a symbolic asset cultivated through social belief in the righteousness of power.
Methodology
This research employs a comparative historical analysis within a theoretical framework that encompasses multiple sources of authority operating in tandem. It uses a four-fold conceptual framework based on Weber's tripartite classification of authority: traditional, charismatic, and legal-rational, extending to analyze the complexities of legitimacy in the Buyid and Seljuk contexts. The four levels identified include: 1) Sacred-Normative Legitimacy (relying on caliphate and religious institution), 2) Sultanistic-Military Legitimacy (based on coercive power), 3) Bureaucratic-Elite Legitimacy (supported by bureaucratic structures and political discourse), and 4) Social-Functional Legitimacy (emphasizing public acceptance and executive efficacy).
Theoretical Framework
The groundwork of this study is built upon multiple theoretical constructs of legitimacy, layered within the historical fabric of Iranian politics. It posits that legitimacy was not derived from a singular source but was rather an outcome of a complex interplay between military power, religious legitimacy, bureaucratic structures, and societal acceptance. The study traces the historical roots of these concepts back to pre-Islamic traditions, such as the notion of "Divine Glory," which integrated political authority with sacred endorsement. This was subsequently reinterpreted within the context of the Islamic caliphate, which served as a religious and institutional source of political legitimacy.
Discussion
Analyzing the Buyid and Seljuk governments reveals distinct approaches to establishing and sustaining political legitimacy. For instance, the Buyids adopted a selectively integrative approach with Shia scholars, fostering a locally resonant and flexible form of religious legitimacy. They managed to cultivate acceptance through their policies of religious tolerance and the promotion of Shia scholarship. In contrast, the Seljuks leveraged support from the Abbasid caliphate and cultivated a broader institutional legitimacy that was more organized and expansive.
In terms of Sultanistic-Military legitimacy, both dynasties prioritized the military's role; however, they differed in their methodologies. The Buyids focused on a balance between the ruling power and military aristocrats, while the Seljuks developed a professional, centralized military force that became a cornerstone of their royal legitimacy. The bureaucratic and elite legitimacy during the Buyid era was characterized by local administration that supported cultural and scholarly elites, thereby reinforcing their prominence. In contrast, the Seljuks institutionalized their bureaucratic legitimacy through the establishment of centralized administrative bodies and academies that solidified their intellectual and institutional authority.
Moreover, social-functional legitimacy manifested differently for the two dynasties. The Buyids engaged in initiatives that revived Iranian-Islamic identity, promoting urban development and supporting science and culture. The Seljuks, on the other hand, institutionalized their claims to social legitimacy through centralized governance structures, educational advancements, and expansive cultural projects.
Conclusion
The investigation into the Buyid and Seljuk dynasties reveals that political legitimacy in Islamic Iran was a multifaceted, historical process reliant on an intertwining of military power, religious endorsement, bureaucratic structures, and societal acceptance. While both dynasties effectively established their legitimacy through diverse mechanisms, their differences in the implementation and prioritization of these methods reflected the historical contexts and social characteristics of their respective eras. The Buyids cultivated legitimacy through local identity and scholarly engagement, whereas Seljuks' legitimacy was more comprehensive and sustained, arising from bureaucratic, doctrinal, and military integrative methods. This study underscores the significance of political legitimacy's complexity and suggests that future analyses of governance must consider the intricate relationships among power, society, and political culture. The findings provide valuable insights into the dynamics of power within Islamic states and continue to resonate within the governance structures of later Islamic administrations.
Keywords
Buyids
Seljuks
Political Legitimacy
Bureaucracy
Educational Institutions
Abu al-Fida’, Imad al-Din Ismail ibn Ali (1417 AH/1997 AD). Tarikh abi al-Fida’, vols. 1 and 2, Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Ilamiyah.
Alaeddini, Bahram (2015). Coins of Iran from the Taherids to the Khwarazmshahs, Tehran: Mirdashti Cultural Center.
 Alam al-Huda, Seyyed Morteza (1984). Rasa’il, vol. 2, researched by Seyyed Mahdi Raja’i, Qom: Dar al-Quran Publications.
Anwari, Muhammad ibn Muhammad (1997). Divan Anvari, edited by Saeed Nafisi, Tehran: Negah Publications.
Articles:
Bandari, Fath bin Ali (1977). History of the Seljuq Dynasty (Zabdat al-Nusra and Nakhbeh al-Asra), translated by Mohammad Hossein Jalili, Tehran: Iran Culture Foundation.
Biruni, Abu Raihan (1984). Athar al-Baqiyyah; translated by Akbar Dana Serasht, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Boyle, John Ender and others (2002). From the Coming of the Seljuqs to the Collapse of the Ilkhanate State, (A Study from the University of Cambridge), vol. 5, translated by Hassan Anousheh, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Christensen, Arthur (1991). Iran during the Sassanids, translated by Rashid Yasemi, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications.
Gardizi, Abu Saeed Abdul Hai bin Dahhak bin Mahmoud (1984). History of Gardizi, edited by Abdul Hai Habibi, Tehran: Donyayah Kitab.
Ghazali, Abu Hamid (1972). Nasiha al-Muluk. Edited by: Jalal al-Din Homa’i. Tehran: Tehran University Publications.
Hamavi, Shahab al-Din Abu Abdullah bin Abdullah Yaqut (2002). Mu'jam al-Adaba, vol. 1, translated by Abdul Mohammad Ayati, Tehran: Soroush.
Hatami, Mohammadreza (2005). “Review and Criticism of the Basis of Government Legitimacy from the Sunni Perspective”, Danesh Siyasi, No. 1, Spring and Summer.
 Ibn al-Abari, Gregory bin Harun (1998). Muhsaqat al-Dawla, translated by Abdul Hamid Ayati, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications.
Ibn Athir, Ezzeddin Ali (1971). Al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh, vols. 15-17, translated by Ali Hashemi Haeri, Tehran: Iran Books Publications.
 Ibn Athir, Ezzeddin Ali (1991). Al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh, vol. 14, Hamidreza Azhir, Tehran: Asatir.
Ibn Babawiyyah (Qummi), Abi Jafar Muhammad ibn Ali ibn Hussein (Sheikh Saduq) (2003). Kamal al-Din and Tamam al-Naamah, vol. 1, translated by Mansour Pahlawan, Qom: Jamkaran Mosque.
Ibn Hawqal Nasibini, Abul-Qasim Muhammad (1987). Sourat al-Arz (Ibn Hawqal's Travels), translated by Ja'far Shaar, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
 Ibn Jozi, Abd al-Rahman (1979). Al-Muntazem fi al-Tarikh al-Muluk wa al-Umm, vol. 8, Hyderabad Deccan: Encyclopedia of Uthman.
 Ibn Jozi, Abd al-Rahman (1991). Al-Muntazem fi al-Tarikh al-Umm al-Muluk, vol. 9 and 14, Beirut: Dar al-Kuttab al-Ilmiyah, researched by Muhammad Abdul Qadir Ata and Mustafa Abdul Qadir Ata.
Ibn Kathir, Abu al-Fida Ismail ibn Omar (1986). Al-Bidaa’ wa al-Nahayyah, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
 Ibn Khaldun, Abd al-Rahman (1989). Al-Abr (History of Ibn Khaldun), vols. 1, 3 and 4, translated by Abdul Mohammad Ayati, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications.
 Ibn Khallikan, Ahmad bin Muhammad (1985). Wafiyat al-Ayan wa Anba’a abn al-zaman, Muhaqiq Abbas Ihsan, vol. 2, Qom: Publisher of al-Sharif al-Razi.
Ibn Maskuyya al-Razi, Abu Ali (1997). Tajarab al-Umm, vols. 5 and 6, translated by Alineghi Manzvi, Tehran: Tus.
Ibn Tabataba (Ibn Taqtaqi), Muhammad bin Ali (1988). History al-Fakhri: On the Manners of Land and Islamic States, translated by Muhammad Vahid Golpaygani, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications.
Iqbal Ashtiani, Abbas (1959). Ministry during the reign of the great Seljuk sultans, with the efforts of Muhammad Taqi Daneshpajouh and Yahya Zakaa, Tehran: University of Tehran.
Isfahani, Abu Na’im Ahmad ibn Abdullah (1989). Dhikr akhbar isfahan, vol. 2, Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Ilamiyah.
 Jalali, Gholamreza (2008). “Five Important Theological Schools of the Seljuk Period, Challenges and Approaches”, Meshkow Quarterly, No. 84 and 85.
Jawzjani, Minhaj al-Din (1984). Tabaqat Naseri (History of Iran and Islam), vol. 1, corrected by Abdolhai Habibi. Tehran: Donyayeh Book Publications.
 Jorjani Yamani, Mohammad bin Mansur (2012). Noor al-Ayoun, introduction and correction by Yousef Beg Babapour and Mehdi Mohaqeq, Tehran: Miras Maktoob.
Kabir, Mafizaullah (2002). Mahigiran tajdar, translated by Mehdi Afshar, Haydari Printing House: Bija
Kabir, Mafizaullah (2010). Al-Buyid in Baghdad, the Caliphate in the Claw of Iranian Power, translated by Mehdi Afshar, Tehran: Rafat.
Kasaei, Noorallah (1984). Military Schools and Their Scientific and Social Impacts, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Kavakbian, Mustafa (1999). The Foundations of Legitimacy in the System of Velayat al-Faqih, Tehran: Printing and Publishing.
Kermani, Naser al-Din Munshi (1985). Nasa’im al-Ashar min la’im al-Akhbar, (in the history of ministers), edited by Mir Jalal al-Din Hosseini Ermavi (Muhaddith), Tehran: Institute of Information.
Kermer, Joel (1996). Cultural Revival in the Buyid Era: Humanism in the Age of Islamic Renaissance, translated by Saeed Hanaei Kashani, Tehran: University Press.
 Khaleghi, Ali (2004). “Shiite Political System in the Thought of Sheikh Mufid”, Humanities and Cultural Studies Research Institute, No. 27.
Klausner, Carla (2002). Bureaucracy in the Seljuk Era (Ministry in the Seljuk Era), translated by Yaqub Ajhand, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Kulini, Mohammad bin Yaqub (1984). Al-Kafi, Vol. 1, Tehran: Dar al-Kutb al-Islamiyyah.
Lambton, A. K. (1984). A Journey through the History of Iran after Islam, translated by Yaqoob Ajhand, Tehran: Amirkabir Publications.
Lambton, A. K. (2000). Government and State in the Middle Ages of Islam, translated by Ali Morshedizad, Tehran: Tabyan.
 Lipset, Seymour (2004). Encyclopedia of Democracy, translated by Kamran Fani et al., Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Publications.
 Madelong, Wilfred (2002). Islamic Sects. Translated by Abul-Qasim Sarri, Tehran: Asatir.
Mas'udi, Abul-Hossein Ali ibn Hassan (1986). Muruj al-Dhahab, vol. 7, translated by Abul-Qasim Payandeh, Tehran: Book Translation and Publishing Company.
 Mawardi, Ali ibn Muhammad (2004). The Rule of Government (Al-Ihakam al-Sultaniyyah and al-Walayat al-Diniyah), translated and researched by Hossein Saberi, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications.
Mirkhwand, Muhammad ibn Qawwandshah ibn Mahmud (1996). History of Rawdat al-Safa in the Biography of the Prophets, Kings and the Caliphs, Vol. 3, Tahhib and Tabkhis of Abbas Zaryab Khoei, Tehran: Scientific Publications.
Modarresi Tabatabaei, Hossein (1995). The School in the Process of Evolution: A Study in the Development of the Jurisprudential, Theological, and Theological Foundations of Imami Shia in the First Three Centuries of Hijri. Translated by Ahmad Aram. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications Company.
 Moghadasi, Muhammad ibn Ahmad (1982). Ahsan al-Taqassim fi Ma'arifah al-Aqalim. Translated by Alineqi Manzavi, vols. 1 and 2, Tehran, Authors and Translators Company.
Mohammad ibn Munawar (1953). The Secrets of Monotheism in the Works of Sheikh Abi Saeed, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Mostofi Qazvini, Hamdallah (1960). Selected History, edited by Abdul-Hossein Nava'i, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Mu'izzi, Muhammad ibn Abdul-Malik (1939). Diwan Mu'izzi, edited by Abbas Iqbal, Tehran: Islamiyah.
 Muqrizi, Ahmad ibn Ali (2001). Al-Mawa'iz wa al-I'ttafir fi dhikr al-Qhat'i wa athar (Recitals and Accountability in Mention of Plans and Athars), researched by Sayyid Ayman Fawad, London: Al-Furqan Institute for Islamic Heritage.
Nakhjavani, Hindu Shah bin Sanjar bin Abdullah Sahebi (1965). Experiences of the predecessors, corrected and edited by Abbas Iqbal Ashtiani, Tehran: Fardin Press.
Neyshaburi, Zahir al-Din (1953). Seljuqnameh, with an introduction by Ismail Afshar, Tehran: Kalaleh Khavar Publications.
 Nizam al-Mulk, Abu Ali Hassan Tusi (1968). Sir al-Mulk (Political Biography), edited by Hubert Dark, Tehran: Book Publishing House.
 Nuri Alaa, Ismail (1996). Political Sociology of Twelver Shiism, Tehran: Qoqnos Publications.
Qafti, Jamal al-Din (1992). Tarikh al-Hikma al-Qafti; Persian translation from the 11th century AH, edited by Bahin Daraei, Tehran: University of Tehran.
Qazvini Razi, Nasir al-Din Abul-Rashid Abdul-Jalil (1979). Refutation: Some of the flaws of the Nawasib in refuting some of the scandals of the Rafidites.  edited by: Jalal al-Din Muhaddis, Tehran: National Art Society.
Qomi, Abu al-Raja (1984). Tarikh al-Wazir, edited by Mohammad Taqi Daneshpajouh, Tehran: Institute of Studies and Research.
 Raghib Isfahani, Hussein bin Mohammad (1999). Hazrat al-Adaba, vol. 1, Beirut: Dar Arqam Company.
Rawandi, Mohammad bin Sulayman (1984). Raha'at al-Sudur and the Verse of the Pleasure, edited by Mohammad Iqbal, Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications.
Sabi, Abul-Hasan Hilal ibn Mohsen (2017). Customs of the Caliphate, corrected and annotated by Mikhail Awad, translated by Mohammad Reza Shafi'i Kadkani, Tehran: Iranian Culture Foundation.
Safa, Zabihullah (1990). History of Literature in Iran, Vol. 2, Tehran: Ferdows Publications.
Samarqandi, Dawlatshah (1987). Tazkirat al-Shu’ara, by the efforts of Mohammad Ramezani, Tehran: Ara Publishing House.
Seyyed Murtaza, Ali ibn Husayn. (1984). Rasa’il al-Sharif al-Murtada, introduction by Seyyed Ahmad al-Husayni, Qom: Dar al-Quran al-Karim.
Sheikh Mufid, Muhammad ibn Nu’man (1992). Al-Irshad fi Ma’arifah Hajjullah Ali al-Ibad, vol. 1, Qom, Sheikh Mufid Congress.
Shushtari, Seyyed Noorullah ibn Sharif al-Din (1986). Majalis al-Mu’minin, vol. 1, Tehran: Islamic Bookstore.
Sobhani, Jafar (2000). Lights on the Imami Shia beliefs and their history, Tehran: Mashaar Publishing House.
Soumer, Farooq (2001). Oghuz (Turkmens), translated by Anna Dardi Ansri, Tehran: Hajj Ta’i Publishing House.
Suyuti, Jalal al-Din (1990). Tarikh al-Khalaf, Aleppo: Dar al-Qalam al-Arabi Syria Publications.
Tabari, Mohammad ibn Jarir (1967). History of the Messengers and the King, Vol. 7, researched by Muhammad Abul-Fadl Ibrahim, Cairo: Dar al-Ma'arif, second edition.
 Tabatabaei, Seyyed Javad (1996). Khajeh Nizam al-Molk, Tehran: Tarh nou.
Toqosh, Muhammad Suhail (2006). The Abbasid Empire, translated by Hojjatollah Jodaki, with additions by Rasool Jafarian, Qom: Hawza and University Research Institute, third edition.
Tusi, Muhammad ibn Hassan (1981). Al-Nahayyah fi Mujard al-Fiqh va al-Fatavi, translated by Mohammad Taqi Daneshpajouh, Tehran: Tehran University Publications.
 Vincent, Andrew (1997). Theories of State, translated by Hossein Bashiriyeh, Tehran: Nay Publications.
 Weber, Max (1988). Basic Concepts of Sociology, translated by Ahmad Sasari, Tehran: Markaz Publications.
 Yaqubi, Ahmad ibn Abi Ja'eez (1993). History of Yaqubi, Vol. 2, translated by Mohammad Ibrahim Ayati, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications.