پژوهش های روابط بین الملل

پژوهش های روابط بین الملل

تاثیر الزامات اقتصادی اتحادیه اروپایی بر فرایند تبدیل ترکیه به قدرت نوظهور اقتصادی (2020-1980)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین الملل، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی . تهران . ایران
2 دانشیار گروه علوم سیاسی . دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی . تهران . ایران
3 دانشیار گروه علوم سیاسی . دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی . تهران . ایران
10.22034/irr.2025.518583.2699
چکیده
ترکیه از دهه 1980 فرایند توسعه ای خود را آغاز کرد و از ابتدای قرن بیست و یکم به تدریج در قامت یک قدرت نوظهور اقتصادی قرار گرفت . این کشور در عین حال همزمان فرایند عضویت در اتحادیه اروپایی را از دهه 1980 آغاز کرد . هرچند این فرایند تاکنون ( 2025 ) به نتیجه نرسیده و حتی در دو دهه اخیر تضعیف نیز شده است با این حال ، فرایند عضویت ترکیه در اتحادیه اروپایی عنصری فعال و موثر در سیاست گذاری ها و روندهای کلان ترکیه در 3 دهه اخیر به خصوص تبدیل این کشور به قدرتی نوظهور اقتصادی بوده است . با این مفروض سوال اصلی مقاله این است فرایند عضویت ترکیه در اتحادیه اروپا، با دربرگیری الزامات نهادی و اقتصادی خاص، چگونه بر شاخص‌های عینی توسعه اقتصادی و جایگاه ترکیه به‌عنوان یک قدرت نوظهور اقتصادی در بازه زمانی ۱۹۸۰ تا ۲۰۲۵ تأثیر گذاشته است؟ در پاسخ این فرضیه مطرح می گردد که نیز الزامات و استانداردهای اقتصادی و نهادی اتحادیه اروپا در چارچوب فرایند عضویت ترکیه اگرچه منجر به عضویت نهایی این کشور نگردیده اما از طریق اعمال مشروط‌سازی در حوزه‌هایی نظیر آزادسازی تجارت، خصوصی‌سازی، بهبود فضای کسب‌وکار، جذب سرمایه‌گذاری خارجی و تقویت زیرساخت‌های رقابتی، زمینه‌ساز رشد پایدار اقتصادی و ارتقای موقعیت ترکیه به‌عنوان یک قدرت نوظهور اقتصادی در نظام بین‌الملل شده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

"Assessing the Influence of EU Economic Conditionalities on Turkey’s Emergence as an Economic Power (1980–2020)"

نویسندگان English

Homeyra Aryanmehr 1
Alireza Soltani 2
Hamidreza SHirzad 3
1 PhD student in International Relations, Department of Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch. Tehran. Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Since the 1980s, Turkey has embarked on a developmental trajectory that, by the early 21st century, gradually positioned the country as an emerging economic power. Simultaneously, Turkey initiated its accession process to the European Union during the same decade. Although this process has not culminated in full membership as of 2025—and has in fact weakened over the past two decades—it has nevertheless remained an active and influential factor in Turkey's macro-level policymaking and strategic orientation. In particular, the EU accession process has played a significant role in shaping Turkey's transformation into an emerging economic power over the past three decades. Given this context, the central research question of the present study is as follows: How has Turkey’s EU accession process—with its specific institutional and economic requirements—influenced objective indicators of economic development and the country’s status as an emerging economic power during the period 1980 to 2025? To address this question, the following hypothesis is proposed: Although Turkey has not achieved full EU membership, the institutional and economic standards imposed by the accession process—particularly through conditionality mechanisms in areas such as trade liberalization, privatization, improvement of the business environment, attraction of foreign direct investment, and enhancement of competitive infrastructure—have contributed to sustained economic growth and the elevation of Turkey’s position as an emerging economic power in the international system.
Introduction
Turkey’s transformation from a largely state-controlled and crisis-prone economy into an emerging economic power represents one of the most prominent development trajectories among middle-income countries. Since the 1980s, Turkey has implemented structural reforms aimed at liberalizing its economy, promoting privatization, and integrating into global markets. Simultaneously, Turkey pursued accession to the European Union, a process that, despite remaining incomplete, has exerted a significant influence on its economic policies and strategic development. EU membership aspirations created an external framework of conditionalities that shaped domestic policy-making, governance reforms, and institutional strengthening. These conditionalities were not merely formal prerequisites for membership; they functioned as mechanisms for promoting sustainable economic growth, enhancing competitiveness, and aligning Turkey with international economic norms. This article examines how Turkey’s engagement with EU economic conditionalities has influenced its evolution as an emerging economic power, emphasizing the interplay between external incentives and domestic developmental strategies. It explores the question of how conditionalities in trade liberalization, investment promotion, privatization, and institutional capacity have contributed to Turkey’s economic modernization, structural reforms, and positioning in the global economy. By analyzing these dynamics, the study contributes to understanding how strategic integration into regional economic frameworks can accelerate domestic development even without formal membership.
Methodology
This study employs a qualitative, descriptive-analytical approach to examine the influence of EU economic conditionalities on Turkey’s economic emergence. Data were collected through extensive library research, analysis of official reports, academic publications, and international datasets from organizations such as the World Bank, IMF, OECD, and WTO. The research focuses on key indicators reflecting economic growth, investment, trade performance, institutional reforms, and competitiveness. Using process tracing and documentary analysis, the study identifies causal relationships between the EU’s conditionality mechanisms and structural economic transformations in Turkey. The methodology allows for integrating historical, institutional, and policy perspectives, offering a comprehensive understanding of the conditionality-driven development process.
 
Theoretical Framework                              
The study draws upon three complementary theoretical perspectives. First, the developmental state theory emphasizes the central role of state-led strategic planning and policy coordination in driving economic modernization, highlighting how governments can direct resources and implement reforms to achieve sustained growth. Second, the EU conditionality framework provides insight into how external requirements and standards act as incentives for candidate countries to reform domestic institutions, policies, and regulatory structures. Conditionalities cover areas such as trade liberalization, privatization, investment promotion, and governance improvement. Third, new regionalism theory contextualizes Turkey’s integration efforts within broader regional and global economic networks, illustrating how regional organizations can influence domestic trajectories and promote structural convergence. Together, these frameworks explain how Turkey’s developmental state strategies were reinforced and shaped by EU conditionalities, creating a dynamic interaction between domestic policy-making and external incentives that underpins Turkey’s emergence as an economic power.
Discussion
Turkey’s economic transformation demonstrates the synergistic effects of domestic reforms and external incentives. EU conditionalities functioned as both a roadmap and a catalyst for structural change, guiding policy decisions across key sectors. Trade liberalization facilitated the integration of Turkish markets into global networks, enhancing export capacity and competitiveness. Privatization and regulatory reforms improved efficiency in previously state-dominated sectors, while measures to attract foreign investment strengthened capital inflows and technological transfer. Institutional reforms aligned domestic governance structures with international norms, fostering policy coherence and enhancing investor confidence. These processes collectively enabled Turkey to diversify its economic base, reduce dependency on state-led interventions, and develop a more resilient, export-oriented economy. While full EU membership has not been realized, the adherence to conditionalities has effectively embedded EU-inspired standards into Turkey’s economic governance, demonstrating that external incentives can shape domestic trajectories even in the absence of formal institutional inclusion. This experience highlights the importance of strategic engagement with regional institutions, illustrating how conditionality mechanisms can serve as drivers of reform and modernization. It also underscores the interplay between domestic political will and external pressures, showing that sustainable development requires a combination of internal commitment and alignment with external standards. The Turkish case provides valuable lessons for other developing countries seeking to leverage regional and international frameworks to accelerate structural reforms, improve competitiveness, and enhance global integration. By linking conditionality compliance to measurable policy outcomes, the study illustrates the potential of institutionalized external influence to complement domestic developmental strategies, ultimately reinforcing Turkey’s position as an emerging economic power within a complex global landscape.
Conclusion
The study confirms that EU economic conditionalities have played a decisive role in Turkey’s emergence as an economic power. Although formal EU membership has not been achieved, Turkey’s compliance with conditionality requirements fostered structural reforms, institutional strengthening, and economic modernization. Conditionalities incentivized liberalization of trade, privatization, investment promotion, and the enhancement of governance frameworks, facilitating integration into global economic networks. The Turkish experience highlights the dynamic interaction between domestic developmental strategies and external institutional pressures, demonstrating that strategic engagement with regional organizations can accelerate reforms and elevate a country’s international economic status. Furthermore, the findings illustrate that external conditionalities can serve as effective mechanisms for promoting long-term sustainable growth, even when formal institutional recognition is absent. For policymakers in developing countries, the Turkish case underscores the importance of leveraging external frameworks to guide domestic reform, optimize policy outcomes, and strengthen global competitiveness. Ultimately, Turkey’s trajectory illustrates that a proactive developmental state, in conjunction with carefully navigated external incentives, can successfully transform national economies, enhance institutional capacity, and establish a robust foundation for emerging economic power status. The study emphasizes that strategic alignment with regional and international standards is not merely an administrative procedure but a central driver of economic development, offering critical insights for countries pursuing similar pathways of structural transformation and integration into the global economy.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Turkey
European Union
Economic Development
Emerging Power
Developmental State
برزگر، کیهان، و مختاری، بهروز. (۱۳۹۲). ابعاد، زمینه‌ها و چالش‌های عضویت ترکیه در اتحادیه اروپا. فصلنامه سازمان‌های بین‌المللی، ۲, ۱۳۷–۱۶۰.
رسولی، رضا. (۱۳۹۲). سیاست‌های توسعه منطقه‌ای ترکیه در فرایند انطباق با اتحادیه اروپا. فصلنامه مطالعات روابط بین‌الملل، ۶. ۲۱. ۱۳۹–۱۶۴.
صولت، رضا، و قوام، عبدالعلی. (۱۳۹۵). بررسی چراییِ موانع عضویت ترکیه در اتحادیه اروپا بر اساس هویت و معیارهای ارزشی-هنجاریِ این اتحادیه. رهیافت‌های سیاسی و بین‌المللی، ۸. ۴۸, ۴۸–۶۷.
عباس‌زاده فتح‌آبادی، مهدی. (۱۳۹۴). رویکردهای فرانوین ترکیه در راستای الحاق به اتحادیه اروپا. دومین کنفرانس علمی پژوهشی افق‌های نوین در علوم جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، معماری و شهرسازی ایران. بازیابی‌شده از https://civilica.com/doc/442387
کوهکن، علیرضا، و حسن‌پور سودرجانی، فروزان. (۱۴۰۰). عضویت ترکیه در اتحادیه اروپا: چالش‌ها و الزامات. دانش تفسیر سیاسی، ۳. ۸, ۲۰–۳۵.
معراجی، ابراهیم. (۱۳۹۹). تغییر رویکرد در سیاست خارجی ترکیه: از اتحادیه اروپا به خاورمیانه. تحقیقات سیاسی و بین‌المللی, ۱۷–۳۱. بازیابی‌شده از https://www.magiran.com/p2293328
Aydın-Düzgit, S. (2012). Constructions of European identity: Debates and discourses on Turkey and the EU. Palgrave Macmillan.
Baldwin, R. (2011). Trade and industrialization after globalization’s second unbundling: How building and joining a supply chain are different and why it matters. NBER Working Paper No. 17716.
Barysch, K. (2007). Turkey and the EU: Can Turkey join the EU? Centre for European Reform.
Buzan, B. (1991). People, states and fear: An agenda for international security studies in the post-cold war era. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Colares, F., & Durmuş, T. (2019). TURK-SWITCH: The tariff-leverage and legal case for Turkey’s switch from EU–Turkey Customs Union to FTAs with the European Union and beyond. Journal of International Economic Law, 22, 99–123.
Dent, C. M. (2008). East Asian regionalism. Routledge.
Ethier, W. J. (1998). The new regionalism. The Economic Journal, 108(449), 1149–1161.
European Commission. (2016a). Commission staff working document—Turkey 2016 report (SWD(2016) 366 final). Brussels.
European Commission. (2016b, December 16). European neighbourhood policy and enlargement negotiations. Retrieved from https://europa.eu
Fawcett, L. (2004). Exploring regional domains: A comparative history of regionalism. International Affairs, 80(3), 429–446.
The Heritage Foundation. (2025). Index of economic freedom. Retrieved from https://www.heritage.org
Kimura, F. (2006). International production and distribution networks in East Asia: Eighteen facts, mechanics, and policy implications. Asian Economic Policy Review, 1(2), 326–344.
Killick, T. (1998). Aid and the political economy of policy change. London: ODI.
Kıbrıs, A., & Müftüler-Baç, M. (2011). The accession games: A comparison of three limited-information negotiation designs. International Studies Perspectives, 12, 399–427.
Kramer, H. (2000). A changing Turkey: The challenge to Europe and the United States. Brookings Institution Press.
Müftüler-Baç, M. (1998). Turkey's relations with a changing Europe. Manchester University Press.
Nas, C. (2011). A stumbling accession process under new conditions. In Ö. Z. Oktav (Ed.), Turkey in the 21st century: Quest for a new foreign policy (pp. 159–184). London: Routledge.
OECD. (2019). OECD economic outlook—Turkey, Issue 2, 216–218.
Öniş, Z. (2008). Turkey–EU relations: Beyond the current stalemate. Insight Turkey, 10(4), 35–50.
Öniş, Z. (2018). Turkey and the EU after the 2016 refugee deal: A troubled relationship in turbulent times. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 27–39.
Papakostas, N. (2012). Deconstructing the notion of EU conditionality as a panacea in the context of enlargement. L'Europe en Formation, 364(2), 215–235.
Rodrik, D. (2008). The real exchange rate and economic growth. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2008(2), 365–412.
Schimmelfennig, F. (2008, July). Entrapped again: The way to EU membership negotiations with Turkey. UCD Dublin European Institute Working Paper, 10–21.
Schirm, S. A. (2002). Globalization and the new regionalism: Global markets, domestic politics and regional cooperation. Polity Press.
Smith, K. (1997). The use of political conditionality in the EC/EU’s relations with third countries: How effective? EUI SPS, Cadmus, European University Institute Research Repository.
Smith, K. (2005). Enlargement and European governance: The case of Turkey. Routledge.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2017). Globalization and its discontents revisited: Anti-globalization in the era of Trump. W.W. Norton & Company.
Tocci, N. (2005). Europeanization in Turkey: Trigger or anchor for reform? South European Society and Politics, 10(1), 73–83.
Tocci, N. (2014). Turkey and the EU: A comparative analysis of accession processes. Journal of European Integration, 36(5), 365–380.
TUIK - Turkish Statistical Institute. (2022). Foreign trade statistics, total import and export. Retrieved from https://www.tuik.gov.tr
UNCTAD. (2024). World investment report 2024. Retrieved from https://unctad.org
UNDP. (2024). Human development reports. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org
Venables, A. J. (2003). Winners and losers from regional integration agreements. The Economic Journal, 113(490), 747–761.
Wade, R. H. (2018). The developmental state: Dead or alive? Development and Change, 49(2), 518–546.
World Bank. (2019). Doing business 2019. Retrieved from https://archive.doingbusiness.org/en/reports/global-reports/doing-business-2019
World Economic Forum. (2019). Global competitiveness index 2019. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-competitiveness-report-2019/
Yilmaz, H. (2017). Democratization, Europeanization, and Turkey’s EU membership bid. Turkish Studies, 18(2), 245–263.