پژوهش های روابط بین الملل

پژوهش های روابط بین الملل

نسبت حق تعیین سرنوشت و اصل تمامیت ارضی در رویه شورای امنیت سازمان ملل متحد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
حسین دهقان زرگ آباد 1
احمدرضا سلیمان زاده 2
آرمین امینی 3
1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه حقوق بین‌الملل، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران
2 استادیار گروه حقوق، واحد ارومیه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ارومیه، ایران
3 دانشیار گروه روابط بین‌الملل، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران
10.22034/irr.2025.539774.2746
چکیده
شورای امنیت سازمان ملل متحد به عنوان رکن اصلی موظف به حفظ صلح امنیت بین المللی در برابر بحران هایی قرار گرفته است که در آن تعارض میان اصل حق تعیین سرنوشت ملت ها و اصل حفظ تمامیت ارضی دولت ها نمود یافته است . این مقاله در صدد است با بررسی مفاهیم بنیادین این دو اصل و تحلیل حقوقی عملکرد شورای امنیت در قبال مواردی چون تیمور شرقی ، آبخازیا ، کریمه و به ویژه قره باغ کوهستانی ، تلاش دارد الگوهای مواجه شورا با این تعارض را روشن سازد . نویسندگان در تلاش هستند با توجه به یافته های مقاله نشان دهند که شورای امنیت در رویه خود غالباً حفظ ثبات بین المللی و احترام تمامیت ارضی تأکید دارد . اما در موارد استثنایی و خاص که با نقض گسترده حقوق بشر یا فقدان نمایندگی واقعی از سوی دولت مرکزی مواجه بوده ، تمایل به حق تعیین سرنوشت داشته و آن را تأیید کرده است . این مقاله نتیجه می گیرد که شورای امنیت ملل متحد در تعادل بخشی میان دو اصل به ملاحظات سیاسی و امنیتی بیش از قواعد صرف حقوقی تکیه کرده است .
کلیدواژه‌ها
شورای امنیت
حق تعیین سرنوشت
تمامیت ارضی
تیمور شرقی
آبخازیا

عنوان مقاله English

The relationship between the right to self-determination and the principle of territorial integrity in the practice of the United Nations Security Council

نویسندگان English

Hossein Dehghan Zargabad 1
Ahmadreza Soleimanzadeh 2
Armin Amini 3
1 PhD Student, Department of International Law, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.
چکیده English

The United Nations Security Council, as the main body responsible for maintaining international peace and security, has faced crises in which the conflict between the principle of the right to self-determination of nations and the principle of preserving the territorial integrity of states has been manifested. This article seeks to clarify the patterns of the Council's dealing with this conflict by examining the fundamental concepts of these two principles and the legal analysis of the Security Council's performance in cases such as East Timor, Abkhazia, Crimea, and especially Nagorno-Karabakh. The authors are trying to show, based on the findings of the article, that the Security Council in its practice often emphasizes maintaining international stability and respecting territorial integrity. However, in exceptional and special cases where it has faced widespread human rights violations or lack of real representation by the central government, it has tended to favor the right to self-determination and has approved it.This article concludes that the UN Security Council has relied on political and security considerations rather than purely legal rules in balancing the two principles.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Security Council
Right to Self-Determination
Territorial Integrity
East Timor
Abkhazia
 
 
Allansson, M., Melander, E., & Themnér, L. (2017). Armed conflict, 1946–2016. Journal of Peace Research, 54(4), 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343317710596
Buchanan, A. (2004). Justice, legitimacy, and self-determination: Moral foundations for international law. Oxford University Press.
Chesterman, S. (2001). Just war or just peace? Humanitarian intervention and international law. Oxford University Press.
Cornell, S. E. (2002). Autonomy and conflict: Ethnoterritoriality and separatism in the South Caucasus – Cases in Georgia. Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University.
Croissant, A., & Kuehn, D. (2018). The politics of secession in multiethnic states. Routledge.
Crawford, J. (2006). The creation of states in international law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
De Waal, T. (2003). Black garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan through peace and war. New York University Press.
Fonseca, F. (2003). East Timor: The price of freedom. Routledge.
Fassbender, B. (2009). The United Nations Charter as the constitution of the international community. Brill Nijhoff.
Hurd, I. (2007). After anarchy: Legitimacy and power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton University Press.
International Crisis Group. (2017). Iraq's Kurdish referendum: The road ahead. Brussels: International Crisis Group.
Ker-Lindsay, J. (2018). The Kurdish independence referendum: Implications for Iraq and the region. Middle East Policy, 25(4), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12345
Malone, D. M. (2004). The Security Council: Practice and promise. United Nations University Press.
McDowall, D. (2007). A modern history of the Kurds (3rd ed.). I.B. Tauris.
Schreuer, C. (2001). The practice of the Security Council. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 5, 1–22.
Talmon, S. (2005). The Security Council as world legislature. American Journal of International Law, 99(1), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.2307/3181185
Taylor, J. G. (1991). Indonesia's invasion of East Timor: An overview. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 21(3), 329–346.
Weiss, T. G. (2013). Global governance: Why? What? Whither? Polity Press.
Weiss, T. G., Forsythe, D. P., Coate, R. A., & Pease, K.-K. (2019). The United Nations and changing world politics (8th ed.). Routledge.
Zurcher, C. (2010). The South Caucasus: Nationalism, conflict and state-building. Routledge.
United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. New York: United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter
United Nations. (n.d.). Charter of the United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter
United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations, Articles 1(2), 2(4), 24, 39–42. New York: United Nations.
United Nations General Assembly. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. New York: United Nations.
United Nations General Assembly. (2014). Resolution 68/262 on the territorial integrity of Ukraine. New York: United Nations.
United Nations Security Council. (1975–1976). Resolutions 384 & 389 on East Timor. New York: United Nations.
United Nations Security Council. (1991–2008). Resolutions 855, 873, 904 on Abkhazia. New York: United Nations.
United Nations Security Council. (1993). Resolutions 822, 853, 874, 884 on Nagorno-Karabakh. New York: United Nations.
United Nations Security Council. (1999). Resolution 1272 establishing UNTAET. New York: United Nations.
United Nations Security Council. (2008). Reports and statements on Georgia, Abkhazia, South Ossetia. New York: United Nations.
United Nations Security Council. (2008). Statements on the Georgia–Russia conflict. New York: United Nations.
United Nations Security Council. (2014). Press statements and resolutions on Crimea. New York: United Nations.
United Nations Security Council. (2014). Security Council draft resolutions on Crimea. New York: United Nations.
United Nations Security Council. (2017, September). Press statement on the independence referendum in Kurdistan, Iraq. New York: United Nations.