International Relations Researches

International Relations Researches

Crisis Management Concept: Perception of Threat and Violence

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Mahdyeh Heidari
Phd. Candidate in International Relations at Allameh Tabataba'i University
Abstract
Actors in the world Politics in dealing with international crises has used various techniques and models for managing crises. These patterns and techniques can be found in two general types of crisis management: peaceful crisis management and non-peaceful crisis management. The third type is the combination of these two categories. Stanford's school is one of the areas that lies in the second category and focuses on the rough management of crises. So the main question of the research is why the Stanford School emphasizes and focuses on the management of violent crises of the international community. The temporary answer is that at Stanford, actors involved in crises, according to perceptions of threats Its goals and interests have benefited from the highest levels of violence for managing international crises. Stanford School model research findings suggest that a critical element among decision-makers in A would create a subjective perception of a threat The answer to this threat is to make it more fragile and more violent interactions betسسween countries Lef and B, and possibly other governments, will form a progressive spiral of violent interaction in the interactions of these actors. The research in this study is descriptive-analytical and data collection, library and Internet
Keywords
International Crises
Violent Approach
Crisis Management
Perception of The Threat
کاظمی، سید علی­اصغر .1378. روابط بین­الملل در تئوری و عمل، تهران: قومس،چاپ اول.
واعظی،محمود .1389.نظام نوین بین المللی و مدیریت بحران های بین المللی ،مرکز تحقیقات استراتژیک،فصلنامه راهبرد، سال نوزدهم ،شماره 59، صص 60-98.
 نصراللهی، اکبر.1389. مدیریت پوشش خبری بحران در رسانه­های حرفه­ای،  تهران: چاپ نشانه.
Boulding, Kenneth. 1969. National Images and International Systemsm,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, VOL, 39, NO, 6.
Brody ,Richard A, North, Robert C,  . 1964. Theory and Measurement of Interstate Behavior: A Research Application of Automated Central Analysis, Stanford University Press.
Brody, Richard A, North , Robert C. 1964. Violence and Hostility: The Path  to World War, Journal of Peace Research, VOL, 3, NO, 2.
Brodin, K, . 1972. Belief systems, Doctrines and Foreign Policy: A Presentation of Two Alternative Models for the Analysis of Foreign Policy Decision- Making, Journal of Cooperation and Complicit, VOL, 7, NO, 10.
Fearon, J, . 1995. Rationalism Explanation for War, International Organizations, VOL, 49, NO, 3.
Gokselisyar ,Omer. 2008. Definition and Management of international crisis”,  Uludag University
Holsti, K. J. . 1985. The dividing Disciplin: Hegemony an Diversity in International Theory, London.
Holsti, Ole R,  Richard A. Brody, North, Robert C. . 1975. Measuring Affect and Action in International Reaction Model: Empirical Materials from the 1962 CuBan Crisis International Conflict and Integration, Stanford University.
Holsti, Ole R, . 1975. The Belief System and National Image: a Case Study., Conflict Resolution, VOL, VI, NO, 3.
James , Patric , Brecher, Michael, . 1988. Crisis Management,Journal of Conflict Resolution, VOL, 32, NO, 3.
Koops,  Joachim A, . 2009. Military Cuisis Management: The Challenge of Inter-Organizationalism, The Brussels Journal of International Relations, VOL, LX 11, NO, 3.
North, Robert, C. . 1975. Decision- Making in Crisis an Introduction, Conflict Management and Peace Science", VOL, 6, NO, 2.
North,Robert c. 1967. Communicion as an Approach to Politics,The American Behavioral Scientist.
North, Robert C., Koch ,Howard E JR , Zinnes ,Dina A., .1960. The Integrative Functions of Conflict, Conflict Resolution, VOL, IV, NO, 3.
Stern, Eric. K , . 2003. Crisis Studies and Foreign Policy Analysis: Insights, Synergies and Challenges, International Studies Review, VOL, 5, NO, 2.
Shechelling, Thomasc. 1960. Arms and Influence., New Haven and  London Yal University Press.
Wilkenfeld,jonathan.1991.Trigger-Response Transitions in Foreign Policy Crisis,  Journal of Conflict Resolution,vol,3, no,1.
Philips, Warren , Rimkunas ,Richard. 1998. The Concept of Crisis in International Politics, Journal of Peace Research,Vol,15,No,3.
Waltz,Kenneth.N. 2000. Structural Realism afer Cold War, Intrnational Security ,V.25,N.1.
Zinnes. D. 1980. Why War,Journal of Conflict Resolution,vol,5, no,2 
International Relations Researches
Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 27
Winter 2019
Pages 161-183